Death of Thatcher

Death of Thatcher

Photo (c) AP /Lefteris Pitarakis

2013

8 April, Monday

Thatcher is dead. At five the editor of the Telegraph tweeted that they had closed all comment lines due to the level of abuse. 

11 April, Thursday 

The phrase that Trevelyan used about the Famine being the work of “an all-wise and all-merciful Providence” smacks so much of Thatcher and the Protestant thing that good works don’t matter, only faith, or, in her case, fanatical conviction. I can’t help also thinking, though, that the Miners’ Strike could not be similarly policed today, with all the camera phones. Nonetheless, on the principle that most of the work of revolutions is done by those about to be overthrown, there could have been no Thatcher without three-day weeks, power cuts, constant strikes and, as one of the Royston Vasey boys once described the shops back then, broken biscuits and boxes weeping with damp. 

12 April, Friday 

Last night I read over the mini-thesis I wrote on the Miners’ Strike in 1985. The subject is well-documented and I had an eye for a quote but, apart from the acknowledgement that Thatcher and Ridley were determined to get the miners, after 1972 and 1974, there is no display of awareness of how the Seventies had paved the way.  

13 April, Saturday 

Tebbit’s Thatcher eulogy in the Lords was ample corroboration of the fact that the Brighton bomb was like the assassination of Heydrich. It took him out, as he himself admitted a few days ago, in not so few words. Even his Wiki entry quotes Thatcher as saying he couldn’t concentrate on anything after that because he was distracted by his constant concern for his wife’s welfare. 

14 April, Sunday 

Ding Dong! The Witch is Dead is in at number two in Britain (52,605 sales). Even the Bishop of Grantham has said this big funeral is only asking for trouble.

Brodsky in Rio

Brodsky in Rio

What made me stick with Joseph Brodsky’s On Grief and Reason was the enjoyable description of how he was ingeniously robbed in Rio while on a Seventies culture junket. There was a dog involved. It was trained to distract gringo sunbathers by tugging at their pants.

There is a pattern among Russian oracles – at least those sheltered in the West – in that they seem incapable of imagining how the world looks to the more circumspect, little-guy countries. It isn’t only Russians either but anyway, there was even a time, back in Leningrad, when Brodsky shared Solzhenitsyn’s (and Nabokov’s) deranged enthusiasm for the Vietnam War but, by the time of this book, there was merely the condescension of a crackpot scheme set out in an open letter to Václav Havel. It was envisaged that Havel would enforce by decree (“although I don’t think your parliament would object”) the serialization of the following writers in Czech daily newspapers.

By giving your people Proust, Kafka, Faulkner, Platonov, Camus, or Joyce, you may turn at least one nation in the heart of Europe into a civilized people.

It now seems a little easier to answer the question as to what on earth Brodsky was doing with “four hundred bucks” on him at the beach in Rio. It remains a minor mystery why he had taken off his watch. (Did he not want a tan line on his forearm?) He wasn’t going for a swim, as the German consul had warned all these cultural gringos that two Hungarians had been eaten by sharks there the week before. Where did he think he was? At home in (non-Latin) America?

The other really instructive piece in this light is the strange meander around Kim Philby, about whom he openly confesses his ignorance.

A country, especially a large one, gets only two [options]. Either it’s strong or it’s weakWho cares what country one grows up in

Of Philby’s life… I know only the bare bones… intuition will suffice.

Why Philby did it is the most interesting question, not least from an Irish perspective. By that I mean asking what it really was that repelled Philby about Britain. That kind of concern however sails over the head of Brodsky who only offers a few trite remarks about English diffidence.

Brodsky’s hero was English. It was Auden, about whom Beckett occasionally voiced his irritation. For example, Beckett reasonably queried a well-known Auden line from the Thirties, about Yeats (“Mad Ireland hurt you into poetry”).

What in the blazes is that supposed to mean?

The last piece in Brodsky’s book was written in memory of Stephen Spender but his hero and the “truly transatlantic texture” of his speech also feature prominently in it. As it happens, in Spender’s Journals there is a memorable line about Auden’s standing in Oxford in 1955, given the latter hid out in the States during the war.

I think that Auden has a hard time in the Common Room at Christ Church, where several of the dons twit him about being an American.

In other words, they were pulling at the pants of his post-war credibility, like that dog on the Copacabana. In their humour there was also a recognition that Britain no longer knew it all and had come down in the world, as America had risen, to be followed by Germany. It is the same humour evident in Jeffrey Bernard’s later vision of paradise, which sounds like somewhere not too far from Rio.

Sitting beneath the palms… I can hear the fizz of frying prawns, the dying hiss of a lobster and the rattle of a cocktail shaker and, with luck, the scream of a German tourist treading on a sea urchin.

A West Briton in Paris

A West Briton in Paris

The 2011 Guardian obituary for its own Peter Lennon included remarks on the making of the documentary for which he remains best known, at least in Ireland. It mentions “the not unkind but at the same time agonizing record of two days spent with a priest nominated by the archbishop’s office” and that line recalled the time the film was finally exhibited on Irish television, as a curious relic.

2006

16 May, Tuesday

I’m watching Peter Lennon’s Rocky Road to Dublin (1968), which was heralded by a documentary on its making and reception last night. Just watching Michael Cleary sing The Chattanooga Shoeshine Boy to a ward of young women serves to remind one of something basic but not mentioned by Lennon – the sheer surrealism of life here (whether priest-ridden or in a time when priests are becoming extinct). Right now, Cleary is spoofing to some gravediggers. There was something rotten in the State indeed. But television lifted the veil of ignorance a long way.

As did the reduction in grinding poverty. By Lennon’s own later account, Samuel Beckett had told him not to bother with the film, as “they” were not “serious people”, which admittedly we are not. Why we are not is the subject of a different essay on this site, Blueshirts in Spain (see the link below).

In pandering to the laziest of misconceptions that exist among the English, Lennon interpreted Beckett’s advice to mean “when it comes to tough issues, my countrymen can be bafflingly skittish and unreliable” (in describing patriotism as a “truculent fever” it is only the patriotism of the colonized at which he sneers).

Though foolishly described by Emil Cioran as a complete Anglo-Saxon, Beckett in fact had not lost his Irishness, even to Lennon’s extent. Then again, he wasn’t writing for the English. His warning implied a wise Irish maxim (‘Don’t draw them on you’) but there is no sign that Lennon ever grasped his message about not inviting unnecessary hassle.

Any genuine understanding or portrayal of Ireland, kind or unkind, first requires a surreal eye, plus a grasp of a principle that is largely alien to the Saxon cultures. Reality should not be taken too literally. There are to be sure flickers of the surreal in Lennon’s memoir Foreign Correspondent (1995). One is his early description of Longford, which, given the resilience of local differences on this island, is unlikely to upset anyone who is not from Longford.

On Fair Day the main street ran with shit. These midlands people were not so much slow as disinclined ever to get started. In my short stay… my main source of insight… was the courtroom. It was in Longford that I discovered why… my mother regularly prayed that we be protected from ‘schemes’… Judging by the courts, the people of Longford were a collection of feuding, barn-torching, spell-laying, litigious rascals very high in the art of scheming.

It has long seemed evident, here at least, that the greatest cultural division in Ireland is really between east and west. (Longford is closer to the west.) At the time of writing, the nation is keeping an eye on a popular scandal starring two indiscreet Galway college lecturers. Bamboozled by the buttons involved in a video call, they were recorded meanly and slanderously bitching about their students. Even the Guardian has covered the story.

At this juncture I must confess to finding the west of Ireland somewhat depressing and somewhere to be rarely visited. My favourite experience in the retelling stakes happened in a pub in Clare. It was a night in the wake of a wedding and the bride asked the best man to sing a song, according a tradition known as the noble call. She then made the diplomatic error of telling them I was from Waterford, on the south coast. Booing by the classy patrons ensued, thanks to a disputed hurling match (which Clare had won) five years earlier.

In general terms, if it isn’t something cheaply comical in the news from the west, it’s yet another medical ‘misadventure’ costing the State a fortune in the courts or it’s the burning down of some premises the most agitated among the locals would have preferred to remain derelict.

Before my re-reading of Foreign Correspondent after a gap of twenty years or so, the only elements I could consciously remember therein were (a) that a large part of it was devoted to the Algerian war’s bloody impact on Paris and (b) that there was a row in a bar between the author and Peter O’Toole, that the row was provoked by Lennon, and that Beckett had to intervene. That was not the only time Lennon caused hassle in the Falstaff. It turned out Beckett also had to step in after Lennon had incensed Jackie MacGowran with a (revealingly) “priggish” review of a one-man show.

Occasionally misleading about historical facts, this sloppily written memoir is mostly devoted to Paris in the Sixties. My favourite howler is a reference to Buster Keaton turning down “the part of Godot” but anyway, it was there Lennon lived after leaving Dublin (and Longford) behind. On his way he took a ferry from Newhaven on the English south coast. Heading to France (sometimes known as the Continent) he then refers to “the white tumbled wake of the ship stretching away softly to the mainland” at another low point of the pandering. It shows the reader early on that, in more ways than the nautical, he does not know his arse from his elbow.

Though he may not have been a resourceful chancer, he too was one, not that he ever acknowledges that archetypal Irish category as directly applying to him. In Paris, a man from Kilkenny tells him of a lifeline opportunity to work as a school assistant, which was available to British college students. Telling him not to worry about the British bit, the man then asks, in an incredulous manner, if he has no one at home to forge a student card for him.  

I remembered that Dublin abounded with chancers… and supposed I could find someone. “For God’s sake… can’t you chance it?”

Lennon got a student card back from Dublin in ten days, accompanied by an unsought fake professorial reference containing “a final masterly touch” in that it was written in green ink. In a contortion of logic, Lennon decides the French clerks processing his application thought Dublin was in the North and that the reference was thus the work of an eccentric professeur britannique.

Had he been capable of more profound reflection on his origins and compatriots, he would have seen the green ink for what it was. A flourish of exaggeration added just for the craic.

Blueshirts in Spain – Dr. John Flynn (wordpress.com)

Graham Greene in Kenya

Graham Greene in Kenya

Noël Coward found Graham Greene to be a somewhat disturbing character and humorously summed up his writing m.o. as follows.   

Sex, Catholicism, sadism, and back to sex 

Greene went to Kenya in 1953 to report on the Mau Mau revolt. Is anyone else repelled by the turd-polishing of British colonialism evident in the Kenya chapter in his 1980 memoir Ways of Escape? It wasn’t as if he didn’t have enough time to reflect on the experience. Would he ever have similarly glossed over the activities of the Americans or the French?

Just look at this selection of quotes :

“The liberal administrator… had been honestly planning a land in which the position of the African would gradually, very gradually, improve…”

“…the old settler… surrounded by sixty thousand acres of his own ranching land…”

“The Kikuyu were not savage, they made good clerks and stewards…”

“Now the margin of profit was threatened… The Mau Mau stole and slashed, the best labour disappeared.”

“They had been settled, in some parts of Kenya, a third as long as the Kikuyu.”

The British land grab in Kenya had begun in the 1890s. The nature of this invasion prompted Winston Churchill to write privately in 1908 … “It looks like a butchery. If the House of Commons gets hold of it, all our plans… will be under a cloud. Surely it cannot be necessary to go on killing these defenceless people on such an enormous scale.”

“…unused land would one day have to be sequestered…”

“Even though the extreme conservative farmers were dying out they could not avoid all responsibility for what had occurred.”

“…somewhere… there must have existed that archetypal figure who would slap his servant’s face if he replied to him in English.”

The white settlers in Kenya were notorious for flogging their employees, as was their judiciary for turning a blind eye to it.

“… neither the trigger-happy East African Rifles, the European police nor the Home Guard came out of the struggle unstained.”

Even the right-wing Daily Mail (12/04/11) can elaborate starkly on this last Greene quote.

“The British crackdown was brutal and almost certainly what today would be termed a disproportionate response. Thousands of Kenyans died in the guerrilla fighting. A thousand were convicted of capital offences and hanged. Many more – perhaps up to 300,000 – suspected of being Mau Mau or even just associating with the insurgents were detained in camps where sanitation was rudimentary, food inadequate, and discipline often brutal and unrelenting.  Beatings are said to have been a daily occurrence. According to evidence in long-concealed official documents now being produced for a compensation court case in London, inmates were tortured, castrated and raped.”

The true moral of colonial war is only hinted at once by Greene, perhaps as flippantly as when he likens the conflict to Jeeves taking to the jungle, having sworn to kill Wooster. He touches on it when he quotes a priest being asked an awkward question by an African. Didn’t God… put the sea between us so that we shouldn’t interfere with each other?

The same moral is unfortunately absent from the American Apocalypse Now with its ending that echoes the way Thucydides in The Peloponnesian War makes Pericles sound like Hitler. It is because your resolution is weak that my policy appears to be mistaken.

At least it is crystal clear in one of the Rambo films, of all things, where Richard Crenna tells it like it is to a Russian in Afghanistan. You can’t defeat a people like that. We tried. We already had our Vietnam. Now you’re gonna have yours.

In other words, get out.

Final Solutions – Globočnik, Trevelyan & the BBC

Final Solutions – Globočnik, Trevelyan & the BBC

Photo: Sir Charles Trevelyan

The 1841 census showed a population of just over eight million in Ireland. Catholics made up eighty per cent, the bulk of which lived in poor or very poor conditions on rented scraps of land. At the top of society stood the Ascendancy class, made up of landowning families either of British descent or descended from Irish converts to Protestantism, which enabled advancement in the colonial context. Only the potato could be grown in sufficient quantity to maintain the system of monoculture that supported this class of parasites.

The potato blight first appeared in 1845. In 1846, the Conservative Prime Minister Robert Peel moved to repeal the Corn Laws, which maintained tariffs on grain imports and kept the price of bread artificially high. The measure split the landowners in the Conservative Party, leading to the fall of Peel’s government on 25 June. Ten days later, Lord John Russell of the Whig Party assumed office. The Whigs opposed state interference in the economy and believed in letting ‘nature’ take its course. Peel’s relief programmes in Ireland were shut down on 21 July 1846 on the orders of Charles Trevelyan, the new Treasury Secretary.

The Irish temperance preacher Father Theobald Mathew soon wrote to Trevelyan, saying that on 27 July he had passed from Cork to Dublin and “this doomed plant bloomed in all the luxuriance of an abundant harvest”. He compared the return journey on 3 August when he saw “one wide waste of putrefying vegetation”. The priest saw that “in one week the chief support of the masses was utterly lost”. Russell’s government introduced short-lived and useless public works projects in the winter of 1846-47, the period of highest Famine mortality, when weak, severely malnourished people were forced to do hard labour to prove their destitution. Then it turned to a mixture of indoor and outdoor direct relief. The former was administered in workhouses; the latter through soup kitchens. The cost of this relief was nonetheless landed mainly on the landlords, who in turn often attempted to reduce their liability by evicting their tenants, like dead souls.

65491450_fp-fb

On 16 February 1940, Odilo Globočnik declared in Lublin that the evacuated Jews should feed themselves and be supported by their countrymen, as these Jews have enough. If this does not succeed, one should let them starve. Half a million people were evicted in Ireland between 1845 and 1851. The Great Hunger clearances in just one county out of thirty-two, Clare, began at the end of 1847 and centrally involved a landlord and land agent named Marcus Keane, who quickly became known as the Exterminator General.

Of Clare’s 153 landowners, 63 were absentees and Keane controlled nearly a quarter of the county. A fanatical Protestant, though Keane is not a colonist’s surname, he promoted forced conversions and even sometimes grotesquely offered a fiver to his tenants to level their own cabins. Keane also maintained an Einsatzgruppe of forty thugs to carry out his massive eviction programme. By early 1849, 90,000 people in Clare were dependent on inadequate rations at workhouses or soup kitchens for any hope at all of survival. In 1851, the census showed a population drop of 74,000 in the county in just ten years. Globočnik killed himself after his capture by the British in 1945. Totally unpunished, the pillar of society Marcus Keane died of natural causes in 1883. His lead coffin was soon stolen from its crypt at night but it was so heavy that the funny thieves decided to hide it in a newly used grave nearby, where it lay undiscovered for many years.

In the absence of any humane state intervention, large sums of money were donated by charitable sources. The British Relief Association was formed in January 1847 by Lionel de Rothschild, a Jewish banker in London. Its international fundraising activities raised almost £400,000. Even the poor Choctaw Native Americans famously sent a few dollars to help. The Ottoman Sultan declared his intention to send £10,000 but then the British consul quietly requested that he give less than Queen Victoria had (£2,000). Victoria did publish two letters appealing for public donations. Her letters were widely criticised at the time, notably by the London Times, namely for encouraging people to throw money into an Irish bog. In 1847 the American government fitted out two ships and loaded them with food supplies. The Jamestown was commanded by a Captain Forbes who accompanied Father Mathew on a tour of the terrible sights in the city of Cork.

I saw enough in five minutes to horrify me: houses crowded with the sick and dying, without floors, without furniture, and with patches of dirty straw covered with still dirtier shreds and patches of humanity; some called for water to Father Mathew, and others for a dying blessing. Forbes also described a soup kitchen where hundreds of spectres stood… begging for some of the soup which I can readily conceive would be refused by well-bred pigs in America.

There was a stark choice for the poorest people: flight to America on the coffin ships or certain death. It is true that much opinion at the time was sharply critical of the Russell government’s response to the crisis. This condemnation was not confined to outside critics. From Dublin, officially the second city of the United Kingdom, even their own Lord Lieutenant, Lord Clarendon, wrote to Russell on 26 April 1849, urging that the British government introduce additional relief measures. I do not think there is another legislature in Europe that would disregard such suffering as now exists in the west of Ireland, or coldly persist in a policy of extermination.

The British government spent just seven million pounds on Famine relief between 1845 and 1850. Contemporaries noted the sharp contrast with the figure of over twenty million pounds given to compensate British slave-owners in the Caribbean in the 1830s. When Ireland had experienced crop failure in 1782-83, the ports were closed and local food prices promptly dropped. That, of course, was before the Anschluss of the Act of Union in 1800, when the semi-independent Irish parliament, composed entirely of Protestant landowners, voted itself out of existence with the assistance of massive bribery. There was no export ban in the 1840s thanks to the Whigs and their avowed devotion to free trade. Ireland thus remained a net exporter of food through most of the Famine.

In response to the biological weapon, Phytophtora infestans, that had fallen in his lap in the form of the blight, Trevelyan described the Famine in 1848 as “a direct stroke of an all-wise and all-merciful Providence” and he was soon knighted for his Irish services. He died in his bed aged 79. As recently as 2014, the BBC felt able to publish this sickening biographical sketch. He has come to represent the British government’s controversial policies of minimal intervention and attempting to encourage self-reliance, and he remains a contentious figure in Ireland. His most lasting contribution, however, began in the 1850s with the publication of his and Sir Stafford Northcote’s report on ‘The Organization of the Permanent Civil Service’.

BBC Trevelyan

To put this snow-job in some context, a BBC viewers poll in 2002 ranked another keen exterminator of Irish civilians and prisoners, Oliver Cromwell, as the tenth greatest Briton of all time. Then again, to give just one crude example of how the spirit of collaboration is endemic in Ireland too, it was only a year earlier that a book by an Irish printer – Cromwell, An Honourable Enemy – received respectful, serious reviews in several Irish broadsheets. The same crank had another go at his theme in 2014, which at least then gave occasion to a funny demolition in the Irish Times by Pádraig Lenihan. I am not sure why Reilly includes a report that Cromwell had his penis shot off at Drogheda. But I am glad he did.

As for the academic “revisionists”, those West Brits bent on whitewashing the Famine as something that just happened – es ist passiert, to borrow the words of Robert Musil – and sneering at folk memory as ‘myth’, well, they had a much longer free run of media propaganda but that too has had its day, not least because (i) the Troubles in the North are over and (ii) the mainstream media are in steady decline. These characters are now often reduced to figures of fun, like the Trinity College Dublin professor hired in 2013 by a private TV station to dig up a 1920s IRA ‘killing field’ in Co. Laois. To the professor’s bewildered disappointment, they found nothing but at least they left the field nicely ploughed for its owner. The same professor subsequently opened Department of Justice files in Dublin to discover the skeletons he’d been looking for had been of men who hadn’t been killed at all.

In contrast to those Irish campus quislings who invented a version of Irish history that most British scholars would greatly hesitate to endorse, it was the English historian Robert Kee who more honestly observed that the Famine could be seen as comparable in its force on “national consciousness to that of the Final Solution on the Jews”. The round figures themselves are uncontested. A million people died. Another two million had left the country by 1860.